<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digital Images</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ipt.us.com/produce-inspection-news-and-comments/digital-images/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ipt.us.com/produce-inspection-news-and-comments/digital-images</link>
	<description>Fresh produce inspection training</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 18:04:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.ipt.us.com/produce-inspection-news-and-comments/digital-images/comment-page-1#comment-226</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 21:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipt.us.com/?p=1017#comment-226</guid>
		<description>Using Digital images to settle high dollar produce
    disputes is like giving the North Koreans blueprints
    to our nuclear technology. If Mr/Ms Produce Receiver
    has their job on the line what&#039;s going to prevent
    them from selecting 12 bruised apples from a full
    shipment, then snaping a few pictures of them and 
    calling the shipper saying those apples represent what
    they saw in one sample? The shipper will never really
    know, will they? As for it being used for identification
    purposes only, why? Most defects should be understood
    simply by stating such. This is just another prime
    example of the cost of something not needed being 
    passed from one to another with the consumer ultimately 
    paying the price for it in the end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using Digital images to settle high dollar produce<br />
    disputes is like giving the North Koreans blueprints<br />
    to our nuclear technology. If Mr/Ms Produce Receiver<br />
    has their job on the line what&#8217;s going to prevent<br />
    them from selecting 12 bruised apples from a full<br />
    shipment, then snaping a few pictures of them and<br />
    calling the shipper saying those apples represent what<br />
    they saw in one sample? The shipper will never really<br />
    know, will they? As for it being used for identification<br />
    purposes only, why? Most defects should be understood<br />
    simply by stating such. This is just another prime<br />
    example of the cost of something not needed being<br />
    passed from one to another with the consumer ultimately<br />
    paying the price for it in the end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

