Berry Pints- Net Weight

February 15th, 2010

The other day I received an interesting question concerning the net weight of a pint of strawberries.  After consulting with the Department of Weights and Measures I was able to give an educated response.  For those commodities designated by dry measurements, pints, bushels, etc. there is no net weight equivalent.

For example, you may receive strawberries, blueberries, or raspberries in clamshells marked 1/2 pint or 1 pint.  The clamshells are not required to weigh a specific weight.  The dry measurements are based on your old math equations, V=length x width x height.  Think of it this way.  You could have a full pint of potato chips and full pint of rocks……each is full, but the pint of rocks would weigh much more than the pint of potato chips.  The inspectors from the state departments of weights and measures would need to have a standard pint measuring device, such as a measuring cup.  2 cups is the equivalent of 1 pint.  Place the contents of the strawberries from the 1 pint clamshell or basket into the 2 cup measuring cup.  If the contents are equal or above the 2 cup line, the volume requirements have been met.  If the contents are below the 2 cup line, the pint of strawberries is in violation. 

Now remember, many if not most of the berry containers are now marked in net weight.  If this is the case, the net weight of the individual clamshell must be met.  Please see the post from February 23, 2009 for the procedures in determining net weight.

You may also find other products that sometimes are packed using volume or are packed by net weight.  For instance, cabbage and onions may be packed in sacks marked as 4/5 bushel by volume, or in sacks marked 50 lbs. Net Weight.  Let me know if you have any questions concerning net weight, or if you have encountered some other containers that make it difficult to determine its contents.

Citrus- Freezing Injury

January 10th, 2010

With the recent reports of freezing temperatures in Florida and in Texas you must be ready to keep your eyes open for citrus arriving with possible freezing injury.  It is impossible to detect externally, meaning you must be ready to cut some citrus to find any problems.

The first questions many people have are;  “What does freezing injury look like?” and “Where is found on the fruit?” and “How much do I have to cut?   Within the next few days or even weeks, citrus that has been subject to freezing temperatures may show 

  1.   Segment walls have buckled at a cross section cut near the stem end;
  2.   Watersoaked condition of the core;
  3.   Mushy condition of segments or portions of segments;

After a few weeks the watersoaked portions will dry out, as the juice sacs collapse having been emptied of juice.

As an inspector you will want to familiarize yourself with some basic inspection procedures for looking for freezing injury in citrus.  Follow these steps:

As shown in the image above of this cara cara orange, you will make a preliminary cut on the orange , cutting enough of the rind at the stem end to just expose the flesh.

The next step is to cut a slice about 1/4 in width.  This segment is allowed to be totally dry or mushy from the freezing injury.  But if this entire segment is affected, and the mushy or dry condition extends into the remaining portion of fruit, the fruit is considered as being damage, a defect.  This defect is considered a quality defect and is scored against the 10% tolerance.

The most important question everyone asks is, how much do you have to cut?  As you can see the USDA has developed a cutting plan for their inspectors. 

The USDA recommends cutting a minimum of 10 fruit if freezing injury is suspected.   For example, if after cutting 10 oranges the inspector finds at least orange with a scoreable defect, from freezing injury, the inspector must cut all remaining fruit in that sample.  They must continue with this procedure for all their samples they inspect.

If you would like to deviate from this procedure I think it would be safe to cut 3-5 fruit per sample, and if a defect is found, cut 20 fruit in your sample.  Doing this for 3 samples would give you a good estimate of the percentage of citrus with freezing injury.

Freezing Problems

December 19th, 2009

Although you may run into problems with frozen loads any time of year, due to issues with the reefers, this time of year adds the element of nature to compound the transit problems with produce.   There are specific products that are more susceptible  to freezing than others, and there are a few places you want to concentrate on looking when a trailer backs in and is ready to unload.

First off, products with higher sugar content usually have a lower freezing point.  For example, broccoli and celery will freeze at 31 degrees, while the freezing point of cherries and grapes is about 28 degrees Fahrenheit.  Finding the freezing injury on some commodities is relatively easy, such as identifying frozen lettuce, romaine, cucumbers.

Other commodities are more difficult to detect freezing injury, especially if it is slight.  Potatoes will breakdown when thawed out, will leak and will produce a strong odor, but in the frozen state they are very difficult to detect.  An inspector must take the point of their knife and insert it into the potato about 3/8 inch and twist the knife, hoping to hear a sharp snap.  If no snap is heard, the potato most likely is frozen.  Sweet peppers are also difficult to detect when freezing injury has affected them, as they will develop sunken pitted areas after they warm up.  But catching the problem up front is not easy.

There are a few places you can concentrate your search for possible frozen product: 

  1. If you suspect a problem, as you may actually see frost inside the trailer floor or wall, the first pace you would want to look would be product in contact with the trailer floor.  Most shippers will stack their product on pallets or lay cardboard down on the floor for protection.  Whether the product is floor-stacked or not always zero in on the floor layer containers first.
  2. The second place to check out would be any containers in contact with the sidewalls.  More specifically check the product that would be in contact with the walls.  Although the walls are insulated the extreme cold may penetrate the walls and affect the product.
  3. And lastly you would want to inspect any of the cartons in contact with the metal rails along the sides of the trailer.  The metal will act as a conductor for the cold and will cause problems for some products in contact with the metal.

If you do find freezing injury always work you way up from the bottom or in from the sides of the trailer or rail car to determine how extensive the freezing injury may be.  If you need to call for a USDA inspection always let the inspector know you have found some freezing injury, point out the location of the problem, and you can even choose to request the inspection be restricted to freezing injury only.  They may otherwise miss the freezing injury as they take random samples throughout the load, not necessarily concentrating on the problem areas.

Net Weight

February 23rd, 2009

Have you ever received some product, found a few containers being short weight and wondered what to do next?

The scenario I will go over here is when the container has a marked net weight.  It doesn’t matter if it is listed in ounces or pounds, or in grams or kilograms, it still must meet the marked net weight.  First things first, make sure your scale is calibrated.  Next you need to factor in the weight of the container.  The USDA method of determining the tare weight (weight of carton) is to weigh 5 empty containers, determine the average of the empty containers, and that is your tare weight.  I have found only weighing 3 empty cartons is plenty, unless you find a discrepancy in the weights, then increase the number to 5 empty cartons.

The USDA policy is to weigh 36 random cartons, from top to bottom on pallets, from front to back of load.  The number of containers in the lot has no bearing on the number of containers being weighed.  Depending on the type of scale, you have two choices, as your scale may be set to eliminate the tare automatically, thus placing the container on the scale will give you a direct reading of the net weight of that one container.  If you do not have this feature, simply place the container on your scale.  This will give you the gross weight.  Subtract the tare weight you determined earlier, and you now have the net weight.

Weigh all 36 containers, recording the weight for each.  Most digital scales record in hundredths, and that would be fine.  Add up all 36 weights, and divide by the number of containers you weighed, giving you the average, or net weight of the lot.  If your 50 pound potatoes averaged 50.04 pounds, they meet net weight.  If the 50 pound potatoes averaged 49.99 pounds they do not meet net weight.

If you explain to the shipper your procedures and your final net weight, chances are he/she will accept your findings.  If  the shipper asks for a USDA inspection, and if the USDA agrees with you, the USDA will be obligated to report the net weight misbranding to PACA.  You may agree to keep the product, but PACA is going to insist the owner (which is you) mark off all reference to the net weight, on every single container.  900/50lbs bags of potatoes is not too bad, but 1600 cartons of tomatoes could be a little work.  And let us not even start talking about having to open master containers to mark off the net weights on 10/5′s or 5/10′s of potatoes, or 48/1 pound bags of carrots.

As long as the average net weight is fine, is there no tolerance for the individual bags to be below the net weight?

Let’s say during your weighing of the 36 cartons, three of the bags weighed the following:  48.55 and 49.75 and  48.22, but the average net weight was 51.25 pounds.  This would still meet the requirements for net weight.  BUT, if a container falls below the reasonable shortage limit (the minimum weight) then it would not matter if the average net weight was met.  The fact that as few as one container fell below the reasonable shortage limit would fail the requirements for net weight.

What are the reasonable shortage limits?

There is chart the USDA follows, but it is basically 4% of the net weight.  In other words, a 100 pound burlap sack of potatoes could not weigh less than 96 pounds.  A 50 pound sack of onions could not weigh less than 48 pounds, or a 25 pound carton of tomatoes could not fall below 24 pounds……but remember the final average always has to meet the marked net weight.

Modified Atmosphere Packaging

November 14th, 2008
Recently we have started to see more and more use of modified atmosphere packaging for different fruits and vegetables.  The breathable packaging is designed to create the optimal shelf life conditions.  This is done by proprietary engineering of the package’s polymer so that the correct balance between oxygen and carbon dioxide is maintained while excess moisture is allowed to escape.After sealing the bag, the fruit/vegetable’s natural respiration lowers the oxygen concentration inside. This results in an increase in the carbon dioxide concentration. As the oxygen concentration declines, the fruit/vegetable’s respiration rate decreases until equilibrium is reached, at which point the rate of oxygen uptake and carbon dioxide production by the produce in the bag equals the oxygen and carbon dioxide permeability of the bag.
This bag, the Xtend®MA/MH environment, suppresses development of decay-causing micro-organisms while preserving the quality and nutritional value of the packaged produce.

Have you noticed improvements with the quality of the product, such as less discoloration, less shriveling? 

 

 

 

 

 

Oranges- Ethylene Gas

August 27th, 2008

Has anyone had any experience with storing oranges along with products that produce ethylene gas?  A reader has noticed that once they changed their storage of oranges, with other ethylene producing commodites, the oranges have showed an increase in decay.  Is there a corrolation between the two?  Your comments would be appreciated.

Bananas- Chilling

August 20th, 2008

Does anyone have any good advice to offer, from experience, at what temperature bananas are subjected to chilling damage?

I have found some information, that relates temperature to the length of time of exposure, for irreversible chilling damage:

From your experience, do you agree with this chart?  Thanks, and I am looking forward to hearing from you.