As 2008 comes to a close, it is time to get ready for the shipments of Chilean grapes and stone fruit to hit the U.S. One of the most common mistakes made is the assumption that all Chilean Fruit, being imported into the United States, has passed a USDA inspection.

The confusion is understandable for a few reasons. The USDA does inspect the Chilean Fruit, but this is for the prevention of pests/insects coming into the country. This is performed by USDA/APHIS, Plant Protection Quarantine (PPQ). Some importers do utilize the USDA/AMS/Fresh Products Branch to inspect the incoming fruit, but this is only for quality control purposes, on a voluntary basis.
Does this mean if the fruit is found our of grade, the fruit is sent back to Chile? No, the fruit is allowed to remain in the United States regardless of any problems, for example, decay, freezing injury, or damaged containers.
Will the containers be marked, as which lots were in grade and which lots were out of grade? No, there will be no designations; in fact some grower’s fruit may be in grade, while other grower’s fruit may be out of grade, within the same shipment.
The grapes taste sour, does this affect the U.S. No. 1 Grade? Yes, depending the variety of Table Grapes, they must meet a minimum percentage of soluble solids. For example, Thompson Seedless must have a minimum of 16.5% Soluble Solids.

The USDA quality control inspections and inspections by private inspection companies are performed at the ports, to determine the quality of the fruit; to determine which fruit can be placed in storage, and which fruit must be sent to the markets for immediate use.
Remember to inspect all incoming shipments thoroughly and don’t assume the fruit has already passed a vigorous inspection process.

Digital Images
June 30th, 2009One of the easiest ways to document and explain a problem you are finding, is to take a digital picture of the defect and e-mail the image(s) to the shipper. Sounds easy enough, right? There are few procedures to follow when taking digital pictures, but you first have to decide when a picture is worth the time.
If you encounter an unusual defect, something you are unaccustomed to seeing, is a good time for a picture. You may find scars on citrus, misshapen tomatoes, discoloration on honeydews, or poorly colored apples. Situations such as these are a great time to pull out the digital camera and take a few pictures of the problem you are finding. It may be difficult to describe the scars (how many scars, how dark, how large, how rough), or the discoloration (brown or black, location on the melon, or if the discoloration is sunken.) When reporting the apples being poorly colored, or light in color, a picture saves time and frustration of trying to describe the light color as pink, or light red, or reddish pink, or on 33% or 40% or on 50% of the apple’s surface.
As you can see from setting two apples up, side by side, the poorly colored apple is easily identified.
When taking your pictures you do want the image to be representative of what you are finding. Try to find a neutral background, one that will allow the product to stand out. It is a good idea to take one or two pictures of the product still in the container. This clears up any doubt to the interested parties of the identity of the product.
As you can see from the above image, the brand is easily identifiable, and I took an image of the product in an open container. No rearranging of the product to misrepresent the problems found. This will show the shipper exactly how the product looks .
You will then want to place some of the defective specimens on a plain background. Try to have the background color contrast with the products color. Lay out a few of the defects, showing good examples of what you are finding.
To produce a clear, close-up of the defect you may have to experiment with a few of the camera settings. First and foremost, placing the camera on a steady object will be a huge benefit. If you can set the shutter to a timer release, click on the shutter and then remove your hands from the camera, this will produce much clearer images. Take a few images with the flash setting on and take a few with the flash setting off. Choose the best images and e-mail your images to the shipper with a short message describing how many (percentages) of the defect you are finding.
If you feel uneasy around a camera, the USDA offers to take the digital images for you. They will follow the same procedures as outlined above, and there will be a fee for their service. They will charge $74 per hour, which includes the time spent setting up the shots, finding some samples, taking the pictures, downloading and e-mailing, as well as administrative time spent on the billing and recording. It is safe to say the fee will about $74 to $148, plus any mileage expenses involved, at $1.32 per mile, round-trip.
I would suggest taking the pictures yourself and sending them to the shipper. Upon seeing the problem, the shipper may work out a price adjustment or a solution and save everyone the time and money of following up with a USDA inspection. If your come across some strange defects, send me some of your pictures and I will share them on the web site. Send your images to: tyawman@ipt.us.com
This entry was posted on Tuesday, June 30th, 2009 at 3:23 pm and is filed under Inspection News/Comments.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.